Thursday, September 30, 2010

Optimise Your Vitamin D levels!

Of all the places $2 billion in government funds could be spent, using it to bring flu vaccines to market faster may be one of the most wasteful uses of that amount of money to date. One dramatic example is the flu shot, which has been proven ineffective time and time again, not to mention the myriad of side effects, some serious, that they cause every year.

If the U.S. government really wanted to make a dent in flu cases this fall and winter, they would put that money toward a massive public education campaign on the importance of optimizing your vitamin D levels.

Now that would be a strategy that would not only dramatically decrease the flu but also help save lives that are being lost prematurely from a completely preventable condition: vitamin D deficiency.

The government has once again pledged their allegiance to the vaccine makers, and will be supporting them full force this flu season, as they do every year.

What You Need to Know Before the Flu Shot Campaigns Begin … This year the vaccine manufacturers are making up to 165 million doses of flu vaccine -- more than ever before. To use up this unprecedented supply, the U.S. Centers of Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is urging all Americans over 6 months to get vaccinated, unless they have an allergy to eggs or other limited conditions.

That’s right. Every man, woman and child is expected to line up and roll up their sleeve for the flu shot … which this year contains a mix of three strains of flu -- H1N1 (swine flu), H3N2 (a new variant of seasonal flu) and influenza B.

This is important information to know, because if you had doubts about receiving the experimental swine flu shot last season, it is now being automatically dished out with every flu vaccine in the United States.

Already, Australia has banned this year’s flu vaccine for children under the age of 5 due to an unusually high number of children suffering adverse effects such as vomiting, spiking a high fever, and convulsions.

Peter Collignon, professor of infectious diseases at the Australian National University, has also gone on record stating that a recent clinical trial uncovered issues with the swine flu vaccine -- adverse effects that are identical to those suffered by the Australian children who reacted to the seasonal vaccine.

Sweden and Finland also recently sounded the alarm because young patients suddenly developed the sleeping disorder narcolepsy after being vaccinated with the H1N1 swine flu vaccine. France, Germany and Norway are now also tallying cases, and the EU has launched an investigation.

But children aren't the only group that seem to react more violently to the trivalent vaccine that contains the H1N1 component.

In the United States, a special government committee has been created to investigate last year's H1N1 monovalent vaccine for signs that it may be associated with a higher rate of certain kinds of reactions. What the committee found out provisionally is that there were three signs of trouble with the H1N1 swine flu vaccine used last year.

Barbara Loe Fisher, founder of the National Vaccine Information Center, explained:

"One was Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), which we know has been associated with influenza vaccine since 1976 when the first swine flu vaccine was used. There is [also] a sign of a blood disorder called thrombocytopenia. Thrombocytopenia is when your blood cannot produce enough platelets. It's an autoimmune type reaction.

The other is Bell's palsy. That's a facial paralysis. It's a neuroimmune reaction.

The government is saying they don't know if these are true signals or not, but there were some red flags that were raised."

Unfortunately, instead of using the $2 billion in funding for further testing to make sure the vaccine is safe considering blatant “red flags” have already been raised, the government is moving full-steam ahead with their plans for a three-in-one flu shot this season, and is even paying the drug companies to figure out how to bring it out even faster.

You’ve probably already seen the signs at your local drug store advertising they’re here … and this is only the beginning.

All the Risk … for No Benefit? You should know that anytime you receive a flu shot, you are taking a risk. In order to get the perceived benefit that you or your family is being protected from the flu (which is only a perception, as I’ll explain below), you are being injected with numerous substances even above and beyond the three flu viruses -- substances with known risks to your health.

Toxic substances found in various flu vaccines include:

* Dangerous levels of mercury in the form of thimerosal, a deadly preservative that is 50 times more toxic than regular mercury
* Ethylene glycol (antifreeze)
* Formaldehyde – a known cancer-causing agent
* Neomycin and streptomycin (antibiotics)
* Aluminum -- a neurotoxin linked to Alzheimer’s disease
* Polysorbate 80 (Tween80™) – which can cause severe allergic reactions, including anaphylaxis
* Phenol (carbolic acid)
* Resin and gelatin - known to cause allergic reactions
* Triton X100 (detergent)

So every year that you get a flu shot, you are taking a risk that one or more of these substances, or the flu viruses themselves, will cause a problem in your body.

The payoff you get for taking this risk?

Well, the pharmaceutical industry would love for you to believe that the flu vaccine is going to somehow magically protect you from dying from the flu.

But in fact the evidence couldn't be clearer -- the flu vaccine doesn't work at all in the elderly, and the data is flimsy at best when it comes to children and adults. In other words, you’re taking all the risk for little to no benefit.

For instance, one recent review looked at the effectiveness of immunizing nursing-home workers to protect the elderly in their care. After reviewing five studies conducted between 1997 and 2009, the results show the vaccination campaigns had NO EFFECT on the number of confirmed influenza cases.

The researchers also concluded that vaccinating staff has no proven impact on reducing the number of related pneumonia cases, or pneumonia-linked deaths -- which, by the way, accounts for the vast majority of what the CDC counts as “flu deaths.”

Said lead researcher Dr. Roger Thomas:

"What troubled us is that [shots] had no effect on laboratory-confirmed influenza.

What we were looking for is proof that influenza ... is decreased. Didn't find it.

We looked for proof that pneumonia is reduced. Didn't find it.

We looked for proof deaths from pneumonia are reduced. Didn't find it."

This is only one example of many. Study after study continue to show that flu vaccines are virtually useless for preventing illness and mortality from the flu, and you can read about five more such examples here.

Let’s Get Real: Here’s What You Really Need to Do to Prevent the Flu There is a massive attempt to defraud and deceive people to generate profits from flu vaccines, and the U.S. government is helping to fund and promote this system.

Fortunately, we are able to penetrate this veil of misinformation, as we did so effectively last year during the swine flu campaign. Last year the United States contracted for the manufacture of over 170 million doses of swine flu vaccine. Probably the most significant accomplishment of this Web site was that we were able to contribute to the fact that only 90 million doses were used in the United States.

This year, we want to start early by warning people about the new plan ... and the safer alternative … so the number of people exposed to potentially harmful and useless flu vaccines drops even lower.

I urge you to take your time and really make an informed decision before you rush to get this year’s flu shot for yourself or your family, and while you’re at it, tune in to the latest studies on vitamin D, which are strengthening the evidence that it is a potent preventive measure against colds and influenza.

There is so much compelling evidence that I believe optimizing your vitamin D levels is one of the absolute best strategies for avoiding infections of ALL kinds, including the flu.

As one recent study showed, a group of children taking vitamin D3 was 58 percent less likely to catch influenza A. That's a higher effectiveness than any flu vaccine can claim, and doesn't come with a barrage of potentially devastating side effects!

Most children, teens, adults and elderly in the United States are vitamin D deficient, especially during the winter months when sun exposure is at a minimum for many. So I urge you to get you and your children's vitamin D levels tested, and if found deficient, follow my recommendations for optimizing your levels.

Do this, and you’ll all be far less likely to catch any cold or flu this year.

So let’s get the word out. Ditch the flu vaccine and optimize vitamin D instead.



Thursday, September 23, 2010

Why Use Only Pure Products?

The skin is the biggest organ of the body and absorbs anything that you put on it. This is why it is so important to be aware of what you put on your skin. It is becoming more widely known that many skin care products contain harmful chemicals. A lot of information is now available thanks to the internet that was not available even a few years ago.
So what we put on our skin should be as good as what we put in it. On a daily basis the normal person applies chemicals to their skin when they use a variety of body and skincare products. Some of these chemicals are absorbed into the bloodstream via the skin. Ouch!
More products are using 'Natural" in their advertising, suggesting that they are free from 'nasties'. But are they, and how do we know who to trust?




Petrol Is For Your Car - Not For Your Skin!
Its not what's in a product that we need to be aware of.
A natural product should not contain - Artificial colours, fragrances, sulfates, ethoxylates, phthalates, DEA, mineral oils, artificial fillers and thickeners. They should be packaged minimally and in materials that are of least harm to the environment. It also seems a general consensus that although petrochemicals (such as vaseline or mineral oils) can be classified as natural, they should not be contained in 'natural products'. Petroleum based ingredients are particularly nasty and may have links to the possibility of causing various cancers. Petrol is for your car not for your skin.
 

Unfortunately in the cosmetic industry there are no laws governing the use of terms like 'natural' and 'organic'. The words 'natural' and 'botanic' mean that the product contains some type of natural ingredient. To confuse even further the word 'organic' is used in much the same way. Many products are labeled as 'natural' when only a small percentage of ingredients are naturally derived. If you are looking for a truly natural product always read the label carefully. Look out for products that have not been tested on animals. 

Wednesday, September 1, 2010

Is Your Home A Healthy Home?

We have been using the same old household products for years, not really thinking about or asking the question what is actually in the products we take for granted every day? We have been on auto-pilot or convinced by advertisers to use a particular product without any thought going into 'how safe is this product?'. We have got complacent and just expect that the Government body that approves products will have approved the products that are available to us in the shops. Interesting isn't it that products that contain warning signs and instructions on what to do should the product get into eyes or the mouth, or in some cases just on your skin, are readily available when other products such as a certain vitamins and herbs are totally banned.

Well I realised some time ago that there isn't anyone looking out for your health or best interests. There is too much money at stake. Big corporations control the Government and unfortunately we the consumer suffer for this. So we are given products that make the producers of them big money with little thought given to the adverse effects that they have on us and the environment.
So, what can we do to ensure that we have a healthy home? We take back control. We look at the list of ingredients in our products before we buy them. We must ensure that we do not lose our right to have products fully and truthfully labeled. (There is an argument to stop compulsory labeling of products as some manufacturers say it increases costs. I think it's because there are so many genetically modified ingredients in our food and so many caustic ingredients in our everyday household products that they don't want us to know whats in them).
There is a definite movement from the consumer towards organic foods, free of pesticides, fertilizers, antibiotics, human growth hormone etc etc...
Likewise there is growing awareness that its important to know what ingredients make up our skincare and cosmetics, perfume and toiletries. As there are thousands of 'nasty' chemicals being used in products that we use on our person and in our homes every day. The incidence of a wide range of diseases including cancers is on the increase.The incidence of kids with A.D.D., autism and neurological imbalances is on the increase too.
I urge everyone young or old to become more aware of what the 'nasty' ingredients are and then you can avoid them and create a happy and healthy home.

Submit Express Inc.Search Engine Optimization Services